Considering user request

I see the user wrote in Chinese about a transfer market valuation for goalkeepers, specifically mentioning Chevalier at 40 million euros. It seems like a news headline or ranking. I'm not sure if they're seeking more details, rankings, context, or something else since they didn't ask a direct question. I should think of asking a clarifying question or maybe offering a top 10 list while ensuring any data is up-to-date. But I must be cautious about browsing capabilities.Analyzing goalkeeper valuations

The user didn't need real-time accuracy, so I can clarify whether they want the full list or an analysis. I should explain that Lucas Chevalier is the Lille goalkeeper valued at 40 million euros. Among other top goalkeepers, there are Diogo Costa, Mike Maignan, and Thibaut Courtois, though Courtois's valuation may drop to 35 million due to injury. I'm curious about why Chevalier ranks at the top; maybe it's a U23 list, or valuations changed after Euro 2024.Exploring goalkeeper rankings

The phrase "德转列世界足坛门将身价榜" hints at a GK ranking, but it's curious that Chevalier is leading with 40 million. Maybe this list focuses on goalkeepers under 23 or born after 2001, where Chevalier, and possibly Mamardashvili, could lead. If it’s the U23 list for 2025, Chevalier's valuation makes sense. The user seems to want more detail, so I should ask if they’d like the full list or a quick analysis. I can provide context on Chevalier's profile too.Summarizing goalkeeper rankings

I want to provide the user with the top few names but need to consider that rankings might change with updates. I should phrase my response in Chinese, acknowledging the headline and asking if the user wants the complete ranking, a breakdown, or related background information. I'll include a quick analysis of Chevalier, noting his key stats and mentioning other high-valued goalkeepers like Maignan and Donnarumma while keeping it concise and easy to read.